U.S. Supreme Court Decides Against Young Immigrants

In a heavily divided decision, Scialabba v. Cuellar de Osorio, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that thousands of young immigrants who were included on their parents' visa petitions as minors, but turned 21 as their parents waited for their visa numbers to become current, could not be converted into a more appropriate visa category.

The U.S. immigration laws provide for a specific number of permanent resident visas, often known as Green Cards, every year. These Green Cards restricted to different categories, for example, Diversity Visas, Employment Visas, and Family Visas. Additionally, the number of these visas is also restricted based on the applicant's country of birth.

Therefore, when an applicant applies for a permanent resident visa, he or she needs to have a visa number "available" before they can get a green card. If the visa number is not available, the applicant has to sometimes wait for many years before getting a green card, even after his or her petition is approved by the USCIS.

Many of these applicants have children who are below the age of 21 born outside the U.S. The have no immigrant benefit of their own, and are present in the U.S. as dependent of their mother or father. However, once the child turns 21, the dependent visa is no longer valid, and they must usually seek out their own permanent visa and start the process afresh, even if their parents have waited more multiple years for visa number availability.

Therefore, a bipartisan group of present and former members of Congress had submitted an amicus curiae brief to the Court, proposing an interpretation of the Child Status Protection Act (CSPA), which would allow the minors to convert to an immigrant petition under a different category. The amicus proposed that the law was intended to reunite families, not extend their separation.

The Court, however, rejected this interpretation. All justices agreed that the CSPA compensates an aged-out child by automatically converting his parent’s original visa petition to the appropriate category for him and by allowing him to retain the “priority date” of the original visa petition. However, a majority of the 5-4 decision rejected CSPA's application to all age-out children. It restricts the application to children who originally fell within the category of children of lawful permanent residents. These young adults now will likely be separated from family members for years—and in many cases, decades—to come.

#ageout #minorchildrenvisapetition #permanentresidentminors #visanumbersforminors

Featured Posts
Recent Posts
Archive
Search By Tags
No tags yet.
Follow Us
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square

Subscribe to Brenman Immigration Law Updates

North Carolina:       976 Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd, 2nd Floor, Chapel Hill, NC - Cornerstone Building - BY APPOINTMENT ONLY

 | Ph: 1-919-932-4593 | Fax: 1-919-942-8674 , Web: visas-us.com 

FOLLOW US:

  • YouTube Clean
  • Google+ Clean
  • w-facebook
  • LinkedIn Clean
  • Twitter Clean

© 2018 by Brenman Immigration Law Firm, PLLC.

 

DISCLAIMER: Brenman Immigration Law Firm is located in Chapel Hill, North Carolina.  We serve clients in Washington, DC, Virginia, Maryland, North Carolina, and nationwide.  Our practice is limited to Federal Immigration Law only. 

 

All material contained herein is for informational purposes only. They are not offered as legal or any other advice on any particular matter. Viewing or transmitting this information does not create nor constitute an attorney-client relationship between Brenman Immigraton Law Firm, PLLC, and the user.  The Firm and the attorneys expressly disclaim all liability to any person in respect of anything and in respect of the consequences of anything done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents of this web site. Reproduction of part or all of the contents in any form is prohibited other than for individual use only and may not be recopied and shared with a third party.  The permission to recopy by an individual does not allow for incorporation of material or any part of it in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic, or any other form.  The site contains links to servers maintained by other business and organizations which is intended to aid research or provide a service to site visitors.  The Firm cannot provide any warranty as to the accuracy or source of information contained on any of these servers.